The Security for Alabama Funds Enhancement, or SAFE Program, is encompassed in Title 41, Chapter 14A, Code of Alabama 1975, as amended, to provide a uniform program for the security of public funds deposited with financial institutions in the State of Alabama that qualify to serve as depositories for public funds. 11.72 KB Download. #Safe shop swan mahotsav program hajipur Bihar. #Safe shop swan mahotsav program hajipur Bihar. The program leverages data from the company’s independently accredited carbon calculator to determine the actual carbon and fuel emissions saved by retreading as an alternative to buying new OTR tires. Customers receive a Maple Program certificate indicating actual data that can be used in reporting. Program -Adobe illustrator 6.0. Store product in original conlalner In a safe place. For complete lock 'N S9Q'f' System llrecUoos seeinslde 1'.is!Xld. AKC S.A.F.E Certified Groomer certification is valid for two years from application approval date.Please allow 1-2 weeks for application review and processing. If you do not pass the test, you can re-take it multiple times for 30 days at no additional charge.
Recent foodborne illness outbreaks associated with tomatoes indicate the storage and handling practices of tomatoes and other fresh produce in food service operations and retail food stores must be re-examined. The FDA's Produce Safety Action Plan (6) recommended adding language to the Food Code to address produce safety at retail. The Conference for Food Protection (CFP) in 2006 recommended to FDA (2) to incorporate 'cut tomatoes' into the definition of potentially hazardous food (time/temperature control for safety food) in the FDA Food Code (5).
A potentially hazardous food (PHF) or time/temperature control for safety food (TCS food) is defined in terms of whether or not it requires time/temperature control for safety to limit pathogen growth or toxin formation. The term does not include foods that do not support growth whether or not they contain a pathogenic microorganism or chemical or physical food safety hazard. The progressive growth of all foodborne pathogens is considered whether slow or rapid. This definition takes into consideration a food's acidity (pH), water activity (aw), or combination of pH and aw interaction, heat treatment, and packaging for a relatively simple determination of whether the food requires time/temperature control for safety. (See Attachment A)
When pH and/or aw are not sufficient to control pathogen growth and/or toxin formation in the food, refrigeration may be the only viable alternative without changing the character of the food. Internal FDA research (see Attachment B) and other published references (1, 7, 9, 10, 11) have shown that the pH (4.2 - 4.8), aw (0.99) and available nutrients of cut fresh tomatoes support the growth of Salmonella spp., the pathogen of concern for cut fresh tomatoes. While the pH and aw of various varieties of tomato may vary somewhat (1) these values are still within the growth range of Salmonella. Therefore, cut tomatoes are considered a PHF (TCS food) because they support the growth of foodborne pathogens.
Historically, most fruits and vegetables have been considered non-PHF (non-TCS food) unless they were epidemiologically implicated in foodborne outbreaks. Since 1990, at least 12 large, multi-state foodborne outbreaks as well as small local outbreaks have been associated with different varieties of tomatoes (2, 3, 6). From 1998 - 2006, outbreaks reported to FDA associated with tomatoes made up 17% of the produce-related outbreaks. Salmonella has been the pathogen of concern most often associated with tomato outbreaks. Natural reservoirs for Salmonella spp. include birds, amphibians, reptiles, soil, pond sediment as well as infected and recovering human beings. Salmonella is viable in the environment (in soil, water, etc.) for months (5).
Biofilm formation by Salmonella allows bacterial cells to survive under adverse environmental conditions and also reduces the ability to remove pathogens by washing even with antimicrobial agents (7, 9). Once a Salmonella cell attaches to a surface such as the tomato skin, after 60-90 minutes it begins to secrete fibers of polysaccharide forming a biofilm in about 10 hrs. It can survive on tomatoes and does not die off during transportation, ripening and storage. The ability to fully decontaminate tomatoes is limited once they have become contaminated and the Salmonella cells have attached to the surface. Whole intact tomatoes with their protective waxy cuticle and low water activity on the surface do not support the growth of foodborne pathogens on the surface of the tomato.
Salmonella spp. can be carried by irrigation water, water flumes or wash water and has also been shown experimentally to enter the tomato plant and fruit through several different routes including through the flower, root, stem scar and cracks, cuts or bruises in the skin (5). Infiltration of microorganisms is also associated with negative temperature differentials between water and the tomato flesh. The temperature of wash water should be at least 10°F warmer than the tomato temperature to prevent infiltration. Cold water causes air cells in the tomato to contract and create a vacuum drawing water into the tomato. Contamination in water or on equipment can include bacteria, viruses, parasites and fungi such as molds and yeasts. In addition to spoilage, fungal contamination can raise the pH of the tomato and improve conditions for growth of foodborne pathogens (11). Once inside the tomato, bacterial pathogens cannot be removed by washing or sanitizing solutions, which in any case can only reduce pathogen levels 1-2 logs.
Other sources of contamination of tomatoes include storing or transporting the tomatoes under conditions subject to cross-contamination from other foods, especially raw meat or poultry. It includes use of dirty equipment and utensils that come in contact with the tomatoes such as dirty sinks or pans for washing, dirty cutting boards, dirty knives, slicers, choppers, etc (8). It also includes no or inadequate handwashing by food employees and ill food employees with symptoms of vomiting, diarrhea or jaundice or a diagnosis of foodborne illness who continue to work with food.
The following recommendations are based on provisions of the 2005 FDA Food Code and the 2006 CFP recommendation to add 'cut tomatoes' (e.g., sliced, diced) to the definition of PHF/TCS food in the 2007 Supplement to the 2005 FDA Food Code. They are being offered to prevent contamination in food service facilities and retail food stores and to minimize the impact when contamination of fresh tomatoes has already occurred (regardless of the location where the contamination occurred).
aw values | pH values | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
<> | 4.2 - 4.6 | > 4.6 - 5.0 | > 5.0 | |
<> | non-PHF*/non-TCS food** | non-PHF/non-TCS food | non-PHF/non-TCS food | non-PHF/non-TCS food |
0.88 - 0.90 | non-PHF/non-TCS food | non-PHF/non-TCS food | non-PHF/non-TCS food | PA*** |
> 0.90 - 0.92 | non-PHF/non-TCS food | non-PHF/non-TCS food | PA | PA |
> 0.92 | non-PHF/non-TCS food | PA | PA | PA |
* PHF means Potentially Hazardous Food |
The 2005 version of the FDA Food Code defines Potentially Hazardous Food (PHF) as any food that requires time/temperature control for safety (TCS) to limit pathogenic microorganisms growth or toxin formation. As part of the recommendations following revision of the definition, a series of experiments was designed to determine if cut tomatoes need to be classified under the PHF/TCS Food category. In the last decade various Salmonella spp. outbreaks have been linked to consumption of cut tomatoes, which raises the question of whether fresh tomatoes should be refrigerated for safety.
In the FDA experiments, Salmonella enterica serovar Enterititis and serovar Newport were grown in Beefsteak and Roma tomatoes at 72°F and 41°F to determine if growth occurs during a 24-hour time period.
Bacterial strain.Salmonella Enteritidis and S. Newport (mango outbreak and tomato outbreak strains) were obtained from the Food and Drug Administration's culture collections.
pH and Water Activity (aw). Measurements for pH and aw were performed on blended tomatoes.
Growth Curves. Beefsteak and Roma tomatoes were purchased from a local grocery store as well as from a restaurant supplier and used for the experiments. In repetitions 1 through 4, tomatoes were purchased from a grocery store and for repetition 5, tomatoes were from a restaurant supplier. In all cases, the ambient temperature tomatoes were sliced or blended the day prior to the experiment and stored at 41ºF overnight until inoculation the next morning. Cut and blended tomatoes were inoculated with an appropriate dilution of the inoculum to obtain an initial concentration of approximately 3 log10 cfu/ml. Tomatoes were incubated at 72°F (room temp.) and 41°C (refrigeration temp.) and growth was followed for 24 hrs of incubation. Salmonella colonies were enumerated on XLD agar after 24 hrs of incubation.
Growth Parameters Calculations. Bacterial concentrations were transformed into log10 values. Lag phase duration times (LDT) and exponential growth rates (EGR) were calculated by fitting data to a linear function that allows for a lag period before initiation of exponential growth.
Results are presented in Table 1. S. Enteritidis and S. Newport were able to grow on both Beefsteak and Roma tomatoes at 72°C. For cut tomatoes, lag duration times (LDT) ranged from 2.88 to 3.81 hrs for the Roma tomatoes and from 5.29 to 7.49 hrs for the Beefsteak. Beefsteak blended tomatoes showed an average LDT of 6.91 hrs compared to 3.4 hrs for the Roma. Exponential growth rates (EGR) ranged from 0.185 to 0.266 logs/ hr and from 0.166 to 0.297 logs/hr, for Roma and Beefsteak tomatoes, respectively. The low pH with a high water activity (>0.99) of the tomatoes was not found to inhibit Salmonella spp. growth in cut tomatoes (See Table B, 'Interaction of pH and aw for control of vegetative cells and spores in food not heat treated or heat treated but not packaged' in the definition of Potentially Hazardous Food (Time-Temperature Control for Safety Food), Section 1-201.10(B) in the 2005 Food Code). No growth was observed on the tomatoes incubated at refrigeration temperatures (41°C).
Inoculation method/ Incubation tempa | Beefsteak | Roma | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rep | pH | aw | LDTb (h) | EGRc (log/h) | Rep | pH | aw | LDT (h) | EGR (log/h) | |
Cut tomatoes held at 72°F | 1 2 3 4c 5d | 4.27 4.88 5.04 4.29 4.23 | 0.996 0.995 0.993 0.995 0.995 | 5.29 6.99 7.49 5.48 5.41 | 0.2210 0.2972 0.2941 0.2438 0.2939 | 1 2 3c | 4.56 5.12 4.23 | 0.995 0.994 0.999 | 3.34 2.88 3.81 | 0.222 0.256 0.2657 |
Cut tomatoes held at 41°F | 1 2d 3e | 5.04 4.29 4.23 | 0.993 0.995 0.995 | indefinite indefinite indefinite | no growth no growth no growth | 1 | 4.23 | 0.999 | Indefinite | no growth |
Blended tomatoes held at 72°F | 1 | 4.88 | 0.995 | 6.91 | 0.1658 | 1 | 5.12 | 0.994 | 3.40 | 0.1854 |
Source: Antonio De Jésus, CFSAN Microbiologist a All tomato temperatures were 41°F at the time of inoculation. |